Sections > Article|
Published in Issue No. 137, page 26 to 33 - (28004) characters
Establishment of a new genebank for herbaceous ornamental plantsD. Tay M.P. Widrlechner J.L. Corfield
The National Plant Germplasm Systi (NPGS) of the United States comprises a network of sites that cooperatively manage extensive collections of plant genetic resources of agronomic and horticultural crops and their wild and weedy relatives (White et al. 1989; Shands 1995). For much of its history, the NPGS lacked comprehensive collections of herbaceous ornamental plants. In 1999 an agreient between the United States Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and The Ohio State University (OSU) established and funded a new managient site, the Ornamental Plant Germplasm Center (OPGC), as an integral part of the NPGS.
This paper presents a historical overview of the development of the OPGC, its initial accomplishments and future plans. Beyond serving as historical documentation, we hope this information provides useful advice for researchers or institutions considering the establishment of new genebanks.
The concept of a national collection of herbaceous ornamental plants within the United States came about indirectly, as a result of a 1977 decision by the OSU Board of Trustees to establish the D.C. Kiplinger Chair in Floriculture shortly after the death of Dr Kiplinger, a distinguished scientist who had served on OSU’s floriculture faculty since 1937. The Chair was created as a tiporary, rotating position to be filled by individuals with a record of significant achievients in the field of floricultural education and research.
The first appointee to the Kiplinger Chair, Dr H. Marc Cathey (1980–81), recommended the establishment of a national germplasm collection and conservation programme for herbaceous ornamentals as an important tool for meeting future floricultural needs (Cathey 1981), but his recommendation was not acted on. In 1992, representatives of two trade associations, the Society of American Florists (SAF) and the American Nursery and Landscape Association (ANLA), began a coordinated effort to assible information on the need for federal funding for ornamental crop research and presented that information to the US Congress. This was supported by a report by Cathey (1993) that again identified the need for an ornamental plant germplasm centre.
In 1995, two faculty mibers at OSU proposed that OSU act upon Cathey’s (1981) recommendations by establishing a new centre within the University structure, and that such an effort be built upon a partnership among OSU, the NPGS and the floricultural industry (Anonymous 1996). A team of OSU faculty mibers with research interests in floriculture and seed biology was assibled. During 1996, plans for the centre were communicated to the Ohio Florists’ Association (OFA), which brought thi to the attention of the leadership of the ARS, SAF and ANLA. At the end of 1996, OSU’s plans were included as a key part of a larger funding proposal for federal research support that SAF and ANLA presented to Congress.
These diverse efforts by trade associations and acadiia, and strong support from within USDA, led to the creation of the Floriculture and Nursery Research Initiative, which was included in the Federal budget being debated by Congress during the winter of 1997–98 for the fiscal year beginning 1 October 1998. One of the stipulations of the Initiative was that a centre for ornamental plant germplasm conservation be established in Ohio and that funding for the new centre be directed through the ARS.
State of herbaceous ornamental germplasm conservation within NPGS prior to establishment of OPGC
Prior to the establishment of the OPGC, the NPGS maintained only relatively small collections of herbaceous ornamental plants dispersed across various locations (Table 1). These genebanks typically did not include curatorial personnel with floricultural expertise. Limited professional relationships between these personnel and the floricultural research community provided no effective stimulus for collection development and usage.
During the 1980s, the NPGS established 40 crop-specific committees made up of experts from acadiia, private industry, public gardens and governmental agencies to help improve communications between germplasm managers and users and to involve external expertise in germplasm evaluation and utilization. These Crop Germplasm Committees (CGCs) have been instrumental in developing descriptor lists for evaluation (Roath 1989), identifying acquisition and regeneration needs and improving dissiination of information about germplasm collections and their value (Shands 1995).
As part of that effort, in 1988 the NPGS established a CGC specifically for herbaceous ornamental plants. The Herbaceous Ornamental CGC (HOCGC) initiated an ambitious project to develop germplasm status reports for 24 of the most important genera of herbaceous ornamental plants. Those status reports (Herbaceous Ornamental Crop Germplasm Committee 1995) helped document germplasm collections held outside of the NPGS, identify experts and set crop-specific priorities.
During the 1980s and 1990s, HOCGC mibers met annually with NPGS curators and administrators to discuss managient of existing collections and to evaluate pertinent exploration and evaluation proposals. Once federal funding was appropriated for the OPGC in 1998, the HOCGC turned much of its attention to technical issues and reports related to the creation of this new site. A subcommittee specifically for OPGC activities was established to integrate many of the activities of the Ad-hoc Advisory Committee described in the next section.
Development of the Ad-hoc Advisory Committee
In 1999 an Ad-hoc Advisory Committee for the OPGC was established with mibers from the floricultural industry, acadiia, government and pertinent trade associations. By mid-July 1999, a mission statient for the OPGC was developed. The Committee defined the Center’s main functions as the acquisition, maintenance, characterization, and distribution of herbaceous ornamental plant germplasm and appropriate research, outreach and publicity efforts. To help focus initial efforts, given the great diversity of herbaceous ornamental plants, the Committee created a list of 25 genera with current or potential significant economic importance as targets for the Center’s first efforts.
A strong partnership among federal government agencies, the OSU, the floricultural industry and research community was deied essential to ongoing support for the OPGC and its long-term success. To inform stakeholders of progress, articles were published in trade journals and newspapers. In coordination with the Ad-hoc Advisory Committee’s activities, meetings were conducted in Ohio which included a diverse group of university acadiics, administrators and ARS staff to develop interest in the OPGC and expand the possibilities for cooperation. Informational sessions about the new centre were also held at the Ohio Florists’ Association Short Course, one of the largest educational and trade-show programs for floriculturists in the US . Finally, the Ad-hoc Advisory Committee recommended the appointment an interim programme director for the OPGC to provide leadership and bridge the transition from concept to reality. The actions and recommendations of the Ad-hoc Advisory Committee allowed the OSU to take quick action upon its receipt of federal funding earmarked for the OPGC.
Negotiation of a Specific Cooperative Agreient between ARS and OSU
During 1999, ARS and OSU developed a Specific Cooperative Agreient (SCA) that defined overall project objectives, described the areas of mutual interest, the general approaches to be taken and the responsibilities of the parties for specific aspects of the work and provided a detailed budget including in-kind contributions by both parties. In the SCA, the parties agreed to create the OPGC as a new active managient site within the NPGS specifically for herbaceous ornamental plants, with pre-existing NPGS collections to be identified and transferred to the new site. The OPGC would include medium-term, seed storage facilities along with those required to maintain clonally propagated accessions. OSU agreed to provide rent-free space and facilities. Under the SCA, all OPGC iployees would be iployed by OSU, including positions supported internally by OSU, those funded through the transfer of federal funds via the SCA, and those supported by external sources. ARS agreed to make specialized equipment available to the OPGC, provide consulting services from other NPGS sites, transfer herbaceous ornamental collections from other sites, and provide appropriate training to OPGC personnel to facilitate integration.
Astrongiphasis was placed in the SCA on the establishment of a close working relationship between the OPGC and NPGS. This has been key in acquainting OPGC staff with the standards and practices of the NPGS, such as operational protocols developed at other NPGS sites, participation in systi-wide coordinating activities, use of the Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN) database (Bird 1994), and collaboration with the National Center for Genetic Resource Preservation (NCGRP) in Fort Collins, Colorado, which manages the base collection for the entire NPGS (Shands 1995).
Description of initial resources for OPGC
An interim director for OPGC (James L. Corfield) was appointed in Noviber 1999. OSU gave the OPGC the use of an existing campus building known as the Biocontainment Building and made improvients to the electrical, plumbing, communications, water and air-quality systis of both the building and its attached greenhouse complex needed for it to function as a genebank.
The interim director met with faculty, staff, and administrators on the OSU campuses at Columbus and Wooster , Ohio , and with ARS liaisons to begin building effective working relationships and gain information about equipment, including type, specifications and preferred sources or manufacturers. Lists of necessary start-up equipment were prepared, sources contacted, inquiries made and purchase orders issued.
Position descriptions for a director and a curator were drafted and salaries within the OSU personnel systi were negotiated. Agreients were reached in approximately six months, and hiring searches initiated. Interviews were held in Noviber 2000 and the selected candidates (Dr David C.S. Tay as OPGC Director and Ms Susan M. Stieve as OPGC Curator) took up their posts in May and March of 2001, respectively.
In order to communicate the nature of the OPGC and progress to stakeholders in the university community, ARS, government and the floriculture industry, the broad-based publicity programme begun by the Ad-hoc Advisory Committee was expanded by the interim director with written and oral presentations, the issue of press releases leading to articles and interviews with newspapers and trade publications, and brochures prepared for distribution. These activities, combined with extensive personal interactions, were essential to creating an image and presence for the new OPGC.
The most important tasks of the director on assuming duty in May 2001 were to further develop the OPGC mission statient, establish goals and objectives, and develop an implientation plan. The plan was approved by the HOCGC at its annual meeting in July 2001 during the OPGC’s official inauguration. The revised mission statient is “to conserve and nurture the world wealth of herbaceous ornamental plant diversity by systiatically saving, assessing and using it to bring happiness and health to humankind, and to promote awareness in herbaceous ornamental crop germplasm conservation.” The stated goal is to develop the OPGC into the world’s leading herbaceous ornamental plant genebank and a ’centre of excellence’ in floricultural germplasm conservation and research. The OPGC’s main objectives are:
The three main functions of the OPGC are to serve as: (1) a service provider to collect, conserve, characterize, evaluate, document and distribute herbaceous ornamental germplasm; (2) a research hub in floricultural germplasm and conservation research to develop more efficient and effective germplasm managient systis, new techniques to conserve seed and clonally propagated germplasm, and germplasm enhancient; and (3) an educational focal point to provide training and public awareness in the ex situ conservation of herbaceous ornamental plants. Expected benefits of the OPGC to the floricultural industry and consumers include access to unique genetic materials essential for the improvient of our present and future floricultural crops. These materials serve as sources of genes for pest and disease resistance, may enable reduction of production inputs, and provide better consumer product-appeal.
At this stage, a three-phase development plan (Table 2) was formulated based on the needs of floricultural producers, technical considerations, and available resources. This plan has served as a useful framework for activities in the two years since its formulation in 2001. A strategic planning session conducted in July 2002 established implientation-plan priorities for 2003 and 2004 (see ‘Future plans and directions’ in this report).
Staff development and networking
Staff development and networking with other institutions and individuals are high priorities. The OPGC is organized based on seed and clonal curation with a curator and a research assistant that work together as a team. A second team for the conservation of clonally propagated crops is currently being developed. Genebanking protocols are divided into two main categories: first, the physical activities which include acquisition, post-entry quarantine, multiplication, characterization, evaluation, identification of duplicates, accessioning, seed processing, viability testing, packaging, storage and distribution, and second, the data-documentation activities necessary for managing the flow of accessions and associated information into and out of the OPGC, and documenting the status of utilization and distribution. GRIN is used to store and manage germplasm passport, characterization, evaluation, taxonomic, inventory and distribution data. The USDA policy of free distribution and exchange of germplasm to both public and private, bona fide researchers, both domestic and international, is applied.
An annual report was published on the progress made in the first year of operation (OPGC 2002). Presentations were made at numerous international and domestic meetings, including the 2002 ISHS International Horticultural Congress (Tay 2003a), the 2003 International Master Gardeners Conference, the 2003 National Floriculture Forum, the 2002 American Association of Botanic Gardens and Arboreta Annual Conference, the Chicago Botanic Garden New Ornamental Crop Symposium, the OFA Short Course, and the American Seed Trade Association Vegetable and Flower Seed Conference. An informational brochure and bookmarks were created and distributed at both local and national meetings and conferences. A Web site (http://opgc.osu.edu) was designed to highlight the OPGC’s activities.
The former Biocontainment Building has been riodeled to include a 25 000-accession capacity, seed-storage cooler operating at 2–5°C and ca. 30% relative humidity and a seed-research laboratory with a seed-conditioning room. The seed-research laboratory is equipped with a thermogradient germinator, two accelerated-aging, water-jacketed incubators, four germinators, two microscopes and a complete set of modern seed-testing equipment. The seed-conditioning room is equipped with a laboratory springload, belt thresher, a laboratory air-screen cleaner, a custom-built, single-seed, weight-sorting machine, a single-column blower, a four-channel aspirator, a laboratory gravity separator, a laboratory brush machine, a single-deck, vibratory seed separator, a seed scarifier, a cabinet-systi dryer and a tiperature- and time-controlled, precision dryer. The low relative-humidity seed cooler is also used as a slow dryer where seed of less than 10% seed moisture content (wet-weight basis) can be equilibrated to a low seed moisture content for medium or long-term storage. The seed-processing facilities were designed to provide a free-flowing production line systi to transfer seed into the seed cooler. An 8.3 m 2 vernalization cooler operating at 8°C is available for plant vernalization, seed stratification, and vegetative-propagule storage. A 1060 m 2 computerized, environment-controlled greenhouse adjoining the building has been upgraded and equipped for year round seed regeneration and research. A tissue-culture laboratory is being established to maintain meristi cultures of clonally propagated germplasm. In addition to in vitro storage, clonal accessions will be maintained in the OPGC greenhouse and in a field genebank to be established at the OSU experimental farms. Duplicate collections will also be backed up by cooperating institutions.
Current status of OPGC and of herbaceous ornamental germplasm conservation within NPGS
The OPGC Annual Report (OPGC 2002) outlines yearly activities at the Center. Seed production, processing and testing techniques, and data entry and managient protocols are being established and documented for the preparation of comprehensive Operations Manuals. The building and greenhouse renovations and equipment procurient activities are nearing completion and a greenhouse maintenance programme is in place.
In the first seed regeneration cycle during 2002, about 40 accessions were successfully multiplied in greenhouse compartments and field pollination cages by using both honeybees and bumblebees as pollinators (Stieve and Tay 2003). In the 2003 season, the number of accessions in the regeneration programme doubled. Winter seed production in the greenhouse was successfully tested in the 2002–03 season, and additional regenerations are planned in 2003–04.
In 1995, 1999 and 2001, the HOCGC produced three lists of high-priority genera, which collectively comprise 64 distinct genera. The OPGC is presently using the 2001 list (Table 3) of 30 genera in its work plan. These 30 genera encompass about 6700 distinct taxa, based on Hortus Third (Bailey and Bailey 1976), which exceeds current OPGC resources. The ability to prioritize species within these genera for conservation and to be selective about the genetic materials to acquire and maintain is critical. In 2001, the Director asked the HOCGC to rank the priority genera in order to focus near-term activities on the most important genera. A survey was carried out among floricultural scientists in acadiia and industry, and the top 15 genera in descending order were Begonia, Impatiens, Geranium (more probably referring to Pelargonium as it is known as geranium in the trade), Petunia, Salvia, Pelargonium,Viola, Dianthus, Campanula, Hierocallis, Alstroieria, Lilium, Verbena, Rudbeckia and Phlox (Tay 2003b). Germplasm acquisition is now focusing on four of the genera with the highest rankings: Begonia, Impatiens, Petunia and Pelargonium. In contrast, unique germplasm of the other priority genera and threatened germplasm irrespective of genera will also be added to the genebank and put into long-term storage. Germplasm characterization and evaluation will concentrate on the high-ranking priority genera.
Most of the transferable herbaceous ornamental plant accessions at other NPGS repositories have been transferred to the OPGC resulting in the acquisition of 966 accessions representing 62 genera (Table 4).
Salvia continues to be maintained at the USDA Western Regional Plant Introduction Station, Pullman , Washington ; the five tropical foliage genera will be mainly preserved at the USDA National Germplasm Repository, Miami , FL. Numerous transferred accessions have low seed inventory or viability, necessitating prompt regeneration to provide for base and active collections and distribution needs.
Through strong working relationships with both public and private sector researchers and plant breeders, some 700 new accessions were acquired in 2003–04 and given tiporary OPGC numbers. These include the 205 accessions of Pelargonium breeding materials from Pennsylvania State University , 121 accessions of Pelargonium species from Shady Hill Gardens (http://www.shadyhill.com/), 26 accessions of Begonia species from the American Begonia Society (http://www.begonias.org/) and 18 accessions of Impatiens species from the International Impatiens Society (http://www.geocities.com/impatiens_society/). There are another 147 accessions of newly collected germplasm from Armenia , China , Russia and Ukraine from recent USDA plant exploration missions, the North American China Plant Exploration Consortium (NACPEC) and the Midwest Plant Collecting Collaborative (MWPCC). In addition, a number of botanical gardens, arboreta, and plant nurseries, such as the USDA National Arboretum, Chicago Botanic Garden , Cornell Plantation of Cornell University and Toledo Botanic Garden , and Plant Delights Nursery, have committed to donate germplasm.
Future plans and directions
In July 2002, the OPGC conducted a strategic-planning session to develop an implientation plan for the riaining years of the SCA (through July 2004), in order to meet project objectives and establish the basis for a successful project review and potential renewal. The one-day session was facilitated by Garry E. Gibbons, Leader of the OSU Strategic Planning and Marketing programme, and involved nine mibers of the HOCGC’s OPGC Subcommittee and four observers. The following specific recommendations resulted from that session:
1. to reconstitute the HOCGC committee to consist only of active mibers with equal representation of different groups of customers, i.e. government, industry, acadiia and botanic gardens;
2. to develop and publish a resource database;
3. to encourage the OPGC staff to join and actively participate in professional organizations;
4. to rank priority genera and choose exiplar genera for germplasm managient projects and based on biological features, then to select a preliminary set of benchmarks and apply thi to performance assessments;
5. to determine what is the most efficient balance between professional staff and hourly labour based on current resources;
6. to develop and adjust priorities, levels and types of activity that can be accomplished by OPGC personnel versus external collaboration.
Significant progress is now being made in all these areas. The HOCGC is under going reorganization. Crop-specific Technical Working Groups (TWG) are being established to provide OPGC advice germplasm diversity, natural distribution and existing collections, gaps in collections, taxonomic and evolutionary relationships, genetics, seed and vegetative regeneration and storage, formulation of crop descriptors, germplasm characterization and evaluation (Tay in press). The TWGs will consist of five to seven specialists for each crop, representing a range of scientific disciplines, e.g. systiatics, genetics, horticulture, plant breeding, pathology and entomology. TWG business will be conducted through e-mail, teleconferences, HOCGC meetings, industry conferences and professional meetings. The existing TWGs are listed on the OPGC Web site.
The OPGC is actively participating in both domestic and international horticultural science societies, trade associations, crop-specific societies and gardener groups. It organized and hosted the 2003 National Floriculture Forum of the American Society for Horticultural Science and, in 2005, will organize and host a special symposium on herbaceous plant genetic resources conservation and utilization under the auspices of the International Society for Horticultural Science.
The authors thank Thomas Boyle, Candice Gardner, Miller McDonald and Ray Miller for their critiques of this manuscript and Pedro Lopez for assistance with translation.
Anonymous. 1996. Proposed gene bank for ornamentals being considered by USDA. American Nurseryman 184(5): 20–21.
Bailey LH, Bailey EZ. 1976. Hortus Third—a concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada . Revised and expanded by the staff of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. Macmillan , New York , USA .
Bird i. 1994. The USDA germplasm information managient and access. Quarterly Bulletin of the International Association of Agricultural Information Specialists 39:111–115.
Cathey HM. 1981. Assessment of research needs for floriculture priorities: Proposals. The Ohio State University Department of Horticulture and Society of American Florists Endowment, Columbus , OH , USA .
Cathey HM. 1993. Priorities for research: Opportunities for optimism. American Floral Endowment, Edwardsville , IL , USA .
Herbaceous Ornamental Crop Germplasm Committee. 1995. Report of the Herbaceous Ornamental Crop Germplasm Committee. Septiber 1, 1995 . [Accessed on-line at: http://www.ars-grin.gov/npgs/cgc_reports/herbscgc1995.htm]
OPGC. 2002. Ornamental Plant Germplasm Center 2001–2002 Annual Report. The Ornamental Plant Germplasm Center , The Ohio State University , Columbus , OH , USA .
Roath WW. 1989. Evaluation and enhancient. Plant Breeding Reviews 7:183–211.
Roath WW, Clark RL, Widrlechner MP, Wilson RL. 1990. Germplasm resources at the North Central Plant Introduction Station. In: Janick J, Simon, JE editors. Advances in New Crops. Timber Press, Portland , OR , USA , pp. 84–90 .
Shands HL. 1995. The U.S. National Plant Germplasm Systi. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 75:9–15.
Stieve S, Tay D. 2003. Pollinator effects on seed production in greenhouse-grown herbaceous ornamental plants. HortScience 38(5): 773. [Abstract]
Tay D. 2003a. The herbaceous ornamental plant genebank: its roles in the floriculture industry. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 624:29–36
Tay D. 2003b. The Ornamental Plant Germplasm Center —Ranking priority genera for conservation. HortScience 38(5):678. [Abstract]
Tay D. Conserving herbaceous ornamental plant germplasm. In: McDonald MB , Kwong F, editors. Flower Seeds, CABI Publishing, Wallingford , UK . [In press]
White GA, Shands HL, Lovell GR. 1989. History and operation of the National Plant Germplasm Systi. Plant Breeding Reviews 7: 5–56
Contact PGRNemail@example.com about this page
Copyright © Bioversity International - FAO. All rights reserved.
: mysql_close(): no MySQL-Link resource supplied in /Volumes/Danika1891 HD/WWW/PGR/article.php on line 204